Five Answers QA Gives to Dev When Testing Changes
Not just a simple Yes...
As QA testers, we play a pivotal role in ensuring that the software our developers create meets the highest standards of quality and functionality. During the testing phase, developers often approach us eagerly (or nervously) to ask, "Did it pass?" Over the years, I've found that our responses typically fall into five distinct categories. Each answer tells its own story about the state of the code?and what's next.
Here's a light-hearted but insightful look at the five answers QA gives to developers when we test changes:
1. "No, there are issues."
This is the classic QA response, and often the most dreaded. When we give this answer, it means we've encountered bugs or inconsistencies that need to be addressed before the code is ready.
Why we say it:
Our role is to be the gatekeeper of quality. We don't stop at saying "No"; we provide detailed feedback, logs, and replication steps so developers can tackle the issues efficiently.
What Devs Should Know:
A "No" from QA isn't a personal critique?it's an opportunity to refine and improve the product.
2. "Yes, but you'll have to wait until bugs are fixed."
This answer signals that the primary functionality works as expected, but there are secondary issues or edge cases that still need attention. While the fix might not be critical to the current release, it's worth addressing.
Why we say it:
We want to ensure you're aware of minor bugs that could grow into larger problems later. Testing is about more than checking boxes; it's about foresight.
What Devs Should Know:
This "Yes, but" approach keeps progress moving while acknowledging the need for future iteration.
3. "Yes, but not what you expected."
This one stings a bit for everyone involved. When we say this, the code works, but the outcome deviates from the intended functionality or doesn't align with user stories or design specs.
Why we say it:
Sometimes, code technically "works" but misses the mark in terms of business requirements or user experience. QA looks beyond the "happy path" to ensure the product aligns with the vision.
What Devs Should Know:
Think of this as a second chance to revisit the user story or refine the implementation. Collaboration between QA, Dev, and Product at this stage is key to success.
4. "Yes, and here's more!"
This is the QA equivalent of a standing ovation. Not only does the code pass testing, but we've also discovered unexpected benefits, optimizations, or overlooked strengths.
Why we say it:
We want to celebrate wins with you! Maybe the new feature performs better than anticipated, or we found ways to leverage it beyond the original scope.
What Devs Should Know:
Cherish these moments. They're proof that all your hard work is paying off?and QA noticed.
5. "Yes, I thought you'd never ask."
This answer is delivered with a mix of relief and satisfaction. It means the code is perfect?or as close as it gets. All scenarios passed, edge cases handled, and performance met expectations.
Why we say it:
This is our way of telling you: "Well done!" A flawless release is rare, but when it happens, it's a moment of pride for the whole team.
What Devs Should Know:
Take a bow, share the success, and let's prepare for the next challenge!
Final Thoughts
Each of these answers reflects a different facet of the QA/Dev relationship. While it's fun to categorize them, the reality is that our responses are a stepping stone for collaboration and improvement. At the end of the day, QA and Dev share the same goal: delivering exceptional software to users.
So, the next time you ask us, "Did it pass?"?brace yourself. Whatever our answer, you'll know it's backed by rigorous testing, an eye for quality, and a shared commitment to excellence.